rs5744886

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.3379-5T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0267 in 1,613,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,214 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 ( 146 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.027 ( 1068 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004335
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.264

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
POLE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
  • IMAGe syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 12-132657434-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132657434-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 380222.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.104 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkc.3379-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 27 of 48 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2 Q07864

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkc.3379-5T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 27 of 48 1 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5 Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0263
AC:
4009
AN:
152146
Hom.:
139
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.108
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00950
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00746
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0313
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0241
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0172
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0382
AC:
9593
AN:
250962
AF XY:
0.0331
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.162
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00686
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0243
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0323
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0267
AC:
38990
AN:
1461442
Hom.:
1068
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0256
AC XY:
18601
AN XY:
726998
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00421
AC:
141
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.156
AC:
6987
AN:
44694
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00685
AC:
179
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00730
AC:
629
AN:
86210
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0312
AC:
1669
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00315
AC:
18
AN:
5706
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0252
AC:
28002
AN:
1111744
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0225
AC:
1361
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1825
3649
5474
7298
9123
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1126
2252
3378
4504
5630
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0264
AC:
4025
AN:
152264
Hom.:
146
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0283
AC XY:
2104
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00590
AC:
245
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.109
AC:
1661
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00950
AC:
33
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000387
AC:
2
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00830
AC:
40
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0313
AC:
332
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0241
AC:
1639
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
36
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
189
378
566
755
944
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0224
Hom.:
27
Bravo
AF:
0.0301
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0202
EpiControl
AF:
0.0224

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Nov 06, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 02, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLE c.3379-5T>C variant was not identified in the literature, Cosmic, MutDB, or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs5744886) as “With Benign allele” and ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine/Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Invitae, and Ambry Genetics). The variant was also identified in control databases in 10094 (549 homozygous) of 276806 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.04 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 5548 (480 homozygous) of 34370 chromosomes (freq: 0.2), African in 136 of 24016 chromosomes (freq: 0.006), Other in 229 (8 homozygous) of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.04), European in 3101 (46 homozygous) of 126470 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Ashkenazi Jewish in 71 (1 homozygous) of 10144 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), East Asian in 4 of 18868 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Finnish in 790 (13 homozygous) of 25700 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), and South Asian in 215 (1 homozygous) of 30774 chromosomes (freq: 0.007). The c.3379-5T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. Positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing; however, 5 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

not provided Benign:4
Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 19, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: c.3379-5T>C in POLE gene is an intronic change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.0333 (3963/118996 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of Latin descent (0.17; 1945/11380 chrs tested) including numerous homozygous occurrences. The observed frequencies exceed the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant of 0.0014%, suggesting that it is a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals in published reports or cited by reputable databases/clinical laboratory. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jan 15, 2025
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The splice region variant NM_006231.4(POLE):c.3379-5T>C has been reported to ClinVar as Benign with a status of (2 stars) criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts (Variation ID 380222 as of 2025-01-02). The variant is observed in one or more well-documented healthy adults.The c.3379-5T>C variant is observed in 135/5,008 (2.6957%) alleles from individuals of 1kG All background in 1kG, indicating it is a common benign variant. The c.3379-5T>C variant is not predicted to disrupt the existing acceptor splice site 3bp upstream by any splice site algorithm. The c.3379-5T>C variant results in a substitution of a base that is not predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Benign. -

May 20, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 08, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
1.6
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
0.26
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00043
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.036
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5744886; hg19: chr12-133234020; API