rs5744946

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.4552-10G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00357 in 1,582,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 65 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 72 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001415
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.67

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
POLE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
  • IMAGe syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 12-132643006-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132643006-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 380231.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0555 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkc.4552-10G>T intron_variant Intron 35 of 48 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2 Q07864

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkc.4552-10G>T intron_variant Intron 35 of 48 1 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5 Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0170
AC:
2592
AN:
152236
Hom.:
65
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0573
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00804
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000620
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000367
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00538
AC:
1172
AN:
217880
AF XY:
0.00402
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0590
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00391
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000571
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00456
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00213
AC:
3043
AN:
1429764
Hom.:
72
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00195
AC XY:
1384
AN XY:
709104
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0594
AC:
1891
AN:
31834
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00481
AC:
178
AN:
36990
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
268
AN:
24526
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39368
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
27
AN:
82108
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51680
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00649
AC:
36
AN:
5546
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
362
AN:
1098780
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
281
AN:
58932
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
171
342
512
683
854
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
72
144
216
288
360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0171
AC:
2601
AN:
152354
Hom.:
65
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0164
AC XY:
1218
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0574
AC:
2385
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00803
AC:
123
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0121
AC:
42
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000621
AC:
3
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000367
AC:
25
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00992
AC:
21
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
129
259
388
518
647
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00330
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0199
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 09, 2016
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 19, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The POLE c.4552-10G>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant, and 3/5 Alamut algorithms predict no significant change to splicing. This variant was found in 676/99708 control chromosomes (13 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0067798, which is approximately 477 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLE variant (0.0000142), highly suggesting this variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The POLE c.4552-10G>T variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs5744946) “With Benign, Likely benign allele”, and ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Invitae and 4 other laboratories). The variant was identified in control databases in 1652 (41 homozygous) of 244502 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.007 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1355 (40 homozygous) of 22986 chromosomes (freq: 0.06), Other in 29 of 5608 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Latino in 118 (1 homozygous) of 27424 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Non-Finnish in 59 of 113062 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 81 of 8140 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), and South Asian in 10 of 25926 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004) while not observed in the Eas Asian and European Finnish populations. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 19, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Jul 19, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.0050
DANN
Benign
0.38
PhyloP100
-3.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000014
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5744946; hg19: chr12-133219592; COSMIC: COSV105885213; API