rs5744946
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.4552-10G>T variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00357 in 1,582,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 137 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 65 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 72 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_006231.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001415
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.67
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 12-132643006-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132643006-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380231.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132643006-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0555 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.4552-10G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.4552-10G>T | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0170 AC: 2592AN: 152236Hom.: 65 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2592
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00538 AC: 1172AN: 217880Hom.: 22 AF XY: 0.00402 AC XY: 477AN XY: 118798
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1172
AN:
217880
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
477
AN XY:
118798
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00213 AC: 3043AN: 1429764Hom.: 72 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00195 AC XY: 1384AN XY: 709104
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3043
AN:
1429764
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
1384
AN XY:
709104
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0171 AC: 2601AN: 152354Hom.: 65 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0164 AC XY: 1218AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2601
AN:
152354
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1218
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 09, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 19, 2016 | Variant summary: The POLE c.4552-10G>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant, and 3/5 Alamut algorithms predict no significant change to splicing. This variant was found in 676/99708 control chromosomes (13 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0067798, which is approximately 477 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLE variant (0.0000142), highly suggesting this variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLE c.4552-10G>T variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs5744946) “With Benign, Likely benign allele”, and ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Invitae and 4 other laboratories). The variant was identified in control databases in 1652 (41 homozygous) of 244502 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.007 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 1355 (40 homozygous) of 22986 chromosomes (freq: 0.06), Other in 29 of 5608 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), Latino in 118 (1 homozygous) of 27424 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), European Non-Finnish in 59 of 113062 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Ashkenazi Jewish in 81 of 8140 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), and South Asian in 10 of 25926 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004) while not observed in the Eas Asian and European Finnish populations. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 19, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 19, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at