rs575215294
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001099403.2(PRDM8):c.1573C>A(p.Pro525Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000453 in 1,545,744 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099403.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDM8 | NM_001099403.2 | c.1573C>A | p.Pro525Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000415738.3 | NP_001092873.1 | |
PRDM8 | NM_020226.4 | c.1573C>A | p.Pro525Thr | missense_variant | 10/10 | NP_064611.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDM8 | ENST00000415738.3 | c.1573C>A | p.Pro525Thr | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_001099403.2 | ENSP00000406998.2 | ||
PRDM8 | ENST00000339711.8 | c.1573C>A | p.Pro525Thr | missense_variant | 10/10 | 1 | ENSP00000339764.4 | |||
PRDM8 | ENST00000504452.5 | c.1573C>A | p.Pro525Thr | missense_variant | 8/8 | 5 | ENSP00000423985.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151992Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000678 AC: 1AN: 147516Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 82658
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000359 AC: 5AN: 1393752Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000290 AC XY: 2AN XY: 690420
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151992Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74240
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at