Menu
GeneBe

rs575862721

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 1P and 7B. PP2BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_014159.7(SETD2):​c.1833G>T​(p.Lys611Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000719 in 1,613,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. K611K) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000073 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SETD2
NM_014159.7 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
SETD2 (HGNC:18420): (SET domain containing 2, histone lysine methyltransferase) Huntington's disease (HD), a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by loss of striatal neurons, is caused by an expansion of a polyglutamine tract in the HD protein huntingtin. This gene encodes a protein belonging to a class of huntingtin interacting proteins characterized by WW motifs. This protein is a histone methyltransferase that is specific for lysine-36 of histone H3, and methylation of this residue is associated with active chromatin. This protein also contains a novel transcriptional activation domain and has been found associated with hyperphosphorylated RNA polymerase II. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, SETD2
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15597707).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152192) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000207 (1/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000476. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SETD2NM_014159.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1833G>T p.Lys611Asn missense_variant 3/21 ENST00000409792.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SETD2ENST00000409792.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1833G>T p.Lys611Asn missense_variant 3/215 NM_014159.7 P3Q9BYW2-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000444
AC:
11
AN:
247910
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000371
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
134594
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000100
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000893
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000726
AC:
106
AN:
1460932
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000771
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
726752
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000225
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000917
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74358
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000332
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000302
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Luscan-Lumish syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMar 15, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNew York Genome CenterApr 18, 2020The p.Lys611Asn variant identified in SETD2 has not been reported in affected individuals in the literature. The variant has 0.000043 allele frequency in gnomAD database (12 out of 279,304 heterozygous alleles) indicating it is a rare allele in general population. The variant affects a moderately conserved residue andin silico prediction tools show conflicting interpretations about pathogenicity of this variant. Based on the current evidence, the p.Lys611Asn variant in the SETD2 gene is assessed as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 26, 2020In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with SETD2-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs575862721, ExAC 0.006%). This sequence change replaces lysine with asparagine at codon 611 of the SETD2 protein (p.Lys611Asn). The lysine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between lysine and asparagine. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.20
T;T
Eigen
Benign
0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.091
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.34
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.89
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;D
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;.
Polyphen
0.88
P;.
Vest4
0.25
MutPred
0.14
Loss of methylation at K611 (P = 0.0151);.;
MVP
0.78
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
0.15
T
GERP RS
3.5
Varity_R
0.36
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs575862721; hg19: chr3-47164293; API