rs577303074

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_003482.4(KMT2D):c.13796C>T(p.Ala4599Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000672 in 1,606,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A4599T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KMT2D
NM_003482.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.985

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

KMT2D (HGNC:7133): (lysine methyltransferase 2D) The protein encoded by this gene is a histone methyltransferase that methylates the Lys-4 position of histone H3. The encoded protein is part of a large protein complex called ASCOM, which has been shown to be a transcriptional regulator of the beta-globin and estrogen receptor genes. Mutations in this gene have been shown to be a cause of Kabuki syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2010]

KMT2D Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

choanal atresia-athelia-hypothyroidism-delayed puberty-short stature syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina, G2P
Kabuki syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
branchial arch abnormalities, choanal atresia, athelia, hearing loss, and hypothyroidism syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Kabuki syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

KMT2D links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.035268664).

BP6

Variant 12-49030644-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-49030644-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 134724.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000919 (14/152326) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00124 (6/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000541. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 9 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 14 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KMT2D	NM_003482.4 link	c.13796C>T	p.Ala4599Val	missense_variant	Exon 42 of 55	ENST00000301067.12	NP_003473.3	O14686-1Q59FG6Q6PIA1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KMT2D	ENST00000301067.12 link	c.13796C>T	p.Ala4599Val	missense_variant	Exon 42 of 55	5	NM_003482.4	ENSP00000301067.7		O14686-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000920

AC:

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

242810

AF XY:

0.000181

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000658

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000113

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000546

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000341

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000646

AC:

AN:

1454452

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000774

AC XY:

AN XY:

723152

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000605

AC:

AN:

33066

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

43498

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25774

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

39570

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000771

AC:

AN:

85620

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52782

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000175

AC:

AN:

5712

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000153

AC:

AN:

1108404

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000117

AC:

AN:

60026

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000919

AC:

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000366

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

ExAC

AF:

0.000190

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Kabuki syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

KMT2D-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not specified

Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.069

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.056

Eigen

Benign

-0.91

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.83

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.39

LIST_S2

Benign

0.68

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.27

MetaRNN

Benign

0.035

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.77

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.28

PhyloP100

0.98

PrimateAI

Benign

0.40

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.15

Polyphen

0.0020

Vest4

0.13

MVP

0.19

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.010

GERP RS

2.4

PromoterAI

0.0017

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Varity_R

0.036

gMVP

0.067

Mutation Taster

=78/22

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over