rs577852020
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_058216.3(RAD51C):c.1097G>A(p.Arg366Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000682 in 1,613,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000068 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RAD51C
NM_058216.3 missense
NM_058216.3 missense
Scores
1
7
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.83
Genes affected
RAD51C (HGNC:9820): (RAD51 paralog C) This gene is a member of the RAD51 family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 and are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein can interact with other RAD51 paralogs and is reported to be important for Holliday junction resolution. Mutations in this gene are associated with Fanconi anemia-like syndrome. This gene is one of four localized to a region of chromosome 17q23 where amplification occurs frequently in breast tumors. Overexpression of the four genes during amplification has been observed and suggests a possible role in tumor progression. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | NM_058216.3 | c.1097G>A | p.Arg366Gln | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000337432.9 | NP_478123.1 | |
LOC105371843 | XR_007065866.1 | n.81-9763C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51C | ENST00000337432.9 | c.1097G>A | p.Arg366Gln | missense_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_058216.3 | ENSP00000336701 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152050Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152050
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 249618Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000742 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134818
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
249618
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
134818
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000685 AC: 10AN: 1460858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726610
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
1460858
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
726610
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152168
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 15, 2023 | Observed in at least one family with breast cancer and segregated with disease in two affected relatives; however, tumor analysis from one individual demonstrated no loss of heterozygosity (Meindl et al., 2010; Gevensleben et al., 2014); Published functional studies demonstrate reduced homologous recombination activity compared to wild-type, increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, and moderate sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, but no significant difference in RAD51 foci formation or interaction with RAD51B, RAD51D, XRCC2, or XRCC3 (Meindl et al., 2010; Somyajit et al., 2012; Somyajit et al., 2015; Mishra et al., 2018; Prakash et al., 2022); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25470109, 24993905, 25292178, 26740214, 20952512, 20400964, 14704354, 12966089, 36099300, 31567591, 29158291, 28829762, 34910513, 36562461, 22167183, 21537932) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 07, 2022 | The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000012 (3/249618 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant is described to be hypomorphic resulting in partial loss of function (PMID: 25292178 (2015), 22167183 (2012)). Additionally, the variant was reported in an individual with familial breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 20400964 (2010)). Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 23, 2023 | This missense variant replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 366 of the RAD51C protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported conflicting findings for this variant for which some have reported hypomorphic or partial loss-of-function (PMID: 20400964, 22167183, 25292178), while others reported no impact on normal binding to RAD51 paralogs, sensitivity to cisplatin and Olaparib treatment and function in a homology-directed repair assay (PMID: 36099300, 37253112). This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 20400964, 23117857, 25470109). This variant also has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60466 cases and 2/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID RAD51C_000025). This variant has been identified in 3/249618 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 31, 2024 | The p.R366Q variant (also known as c.1097G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the RAD51C gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1097. The arginine at codon 366 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. In a study of 1100 German high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families, this variant was detected in one family (Meindl A et al. Nat. Genet., 2010 May;42:410-4). Another study detected this variant in 1/492 breast cancer patients with family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (Romero A et al. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 2011 Oct;129:939-46). This variant was also identified in a cohort of individuals with at least 3 primary melanoma diagnoses (Li C et al. Melanoma Res, 2020 06;30:247-251). Functional studies have shown a reduction in homologous recombination activity from this alteration compared to wild-type protein (Somyajit K et al. Carcinogenesis, 2015 Jan;36:13-24). In another study, this alteration was shown to have reduced protein levels in the nucleus as compared to wild-type protein, but no change in protein levels in the mitochondria (Mishra A et al. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2018 02;38). However, in a homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) and PARP inhibitor and cisplatin sensitivity assay, this alteration showed a functionally normal read-out (Hu C et al. Cancer Res, 2023 Aug;83:2557-2571). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | curation | Leiden Open Variation Database | Nov 02, 2014 | Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Johan den Dunnen. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 04, 2022 | - - |
Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University | Jan 01, 2022 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group O Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 366 of the RAD51C protein (p.Arg366Gln). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 20400964). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 420041). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RAD51C function (PMID: 20400964, 22167183). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jun 16, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of loop (P = 0.0203);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at