rs58461416

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):​c.5286T>A​(p.Pro1762Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00208 in 1,592,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 110 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 ( 20 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 90 hom. )

Consequence

PCDH15
NM_033056.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.344
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 10-53822440-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53822440-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 46492.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.344 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0685 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PCDH15NM_033056.4 linkc.5286T>A p.Pro1762Pro synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 33 ENST00000320301.11 NP_149045.3 Q96QU1-1
PCDH15NM_001384140.1 linkc.4368-2210T>A intron_variant Intron 32 of 37 ENST00000644397.2 NP_001371069.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCDH15ENST00000320301.11 linkc.5286T>A p.Pro1762Pro synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 33 1 NM_033056.4 ENSP00000322604.6 Q96QU1-1
PCDH15ENST00000644397.2 linkc.4368-2210T>A intron_variant Intron 32 of 37 NM_001384140.1 ENSP00000495195.1 A0A2R8Y6C0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00298
AC:
450
AN:
150818
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000666
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00152
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0747
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00240
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00655
AC:
1400
AN:
213664
Hom.:
60
AF XY:
0.00602
AC XY:
699
AN XY:
116058
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000475
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0878
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000606
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000143
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00437
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00199
AC:
2868
AN:
1441226
Hom.:
90
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00187
AC XY:
1339
AN XY:
715488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000213
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0639
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000499
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000193
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000690
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00517
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00298
AC:
450
AN:
150936
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00320
AC XY:
236
AN XY:
73808
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000664
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0747
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000133
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00285
Alfa
AF:
0.000507
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00365

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Jul 25, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 13, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 20, 2017
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 28, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
7.6
DANN
Benign
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs58461416; hg19: chr10-55582200; COSMIC: COSV57405081; COSMIC: COSV57405081; API