rs58465962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):​c.1155G>T​(p.Val385=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0108 in 1,611,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 754 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.041 ( 389 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0076 ( 365 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.490
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).
BP6
Variant 2-166288596-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166288596-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130255.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-166288596-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.49 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.129 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1155G>T p.Val385= synonymous_variant 10/27 ENST00000642356.2 NP_001352465.1
SCN1A-AS1NR_110260.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1030-5969C>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1155G>T p.Val385= synonymous_variant 10/27 NM_001365536.1 ENSP00000495601 P1Q15858-1
SCN1A-AS1ENST00000651574.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1708-5969C>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0411
AC:
6245
AN:
152052
Hom.:
389
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0282
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0349
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0150
AC:
3726
AN:
248062
Hom.:
170
AF XY:
0.0138
AC XY:
1857
AN XY:
134570
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00841
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0356
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000929
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00358
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00765
AC:
11162
AN:
1459460
Hom.:
365
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00776
AC XY:
5633
AN XY:
725944
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0369
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0166
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0161
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0412
AC:
6268
AN:
152168
Hom.:
389
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0396
AC XY:
2949
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0282
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0346
Alfa
AF:
0.0196
Hom.:
62
Bravo
AF:
0.0454
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
44
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 10, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
5.3
DANN
Benign
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs58465962; hg19: chr2-167145106; COSMIC: COSV104409077; COSMIC: COSV104409077; API