rs585692

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.5718C>A​(p.Thr1906Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.926 in 1,541,246 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 661,347 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1906T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.94 ( 67723 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.92 ( 593624 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.509

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).
BP6
Variant 11-103176278-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103176278-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 167011.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.509 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.972 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkc.5718C>A p.Thr1906Thr synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 90 ENST00000650373.2 NP_001073932.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkc.5718C>A p.Thr1906Thr synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 89 ENST00000375735.7 NP_001368.2 Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkc.5718C>A p.Thr1906Thr synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 90 NM_001080463.2 ENSP00000497174.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkc.5718C>A p.Thr1906Thr synonymous_variant Exon 37 of 89 1 NM_001377.3 ENSP00000364887.2 Q8NCM8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.943
AC:
143403
AN:
152150
Hom.:
67652
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.980
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.971
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.942
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.911
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.873
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.880
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.976
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.864
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.926
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.938
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.926
AC:
137631
AN:
148700
AF XY:
0.921
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.981
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.961
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.908
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.865
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.971
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.924
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.916
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.924
AC:
1283516
AN:
1388978
Hom.:
593624
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.922
AC XY:
631398
AN XY:
684764
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.981
AC:
30344
AN:
30930
American (AMR)
AF:
0.959
AC:
32701
AN:
34088
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.912
AC:
22837
AN:
25044
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.855
AC:
29995
AN:
35086
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.880
AC:
67125
AN:
76270
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.969
AC:
47834
AN:
49386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.868
AC:
4916
AN:
5666
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.925
AC:
994534
AN:
1074886
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.924
AC:
53230
AN:
57622
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4577
9154
13732
18309
22886
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21124
42248
63372
84496
105620
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.943
AC:
143533
AN:
152268
Hom.:
67723
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.942
AC XY:
70140
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.980
AC:
40749
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.942
AC:
14399
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.911
AC:
3163
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.873
AC:
4522
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.881
AC:
4241
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.976
AC:
10355
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.867
AC:
255
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.926
AC:
62984
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.938
AC:
1979
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
417
835
1252
1670
2087
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
910
1820
2730
3640
4550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.931
Hom.:
46023
Bravo
AF:
0.943
Asia WGS
AF:
0.853
AC:
2964
AN:
3474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 30, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
1.8
DANN
Benign
0.60
PhyloP100
0.51
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs585692; hg19: chr11-103047007; COSMIC: COSV108161705; API