rs587778175

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):ā€‹c.1214A>Gā€‹(p.Asn405Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000477 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000052 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1076417).
BP6
Variant 16-68813389-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68813389-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 133854.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=5, not_provided=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 76 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1214A>G p.Asn405Ser missense_variant 9/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-402A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 9/16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-606A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 9/15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1137+1126A>G intron_variant NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1214A>G p.Asn405Ser missense_variant 9/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000278
AC:
7
AN:
251488
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000441
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000520
AC:
76
AN:
1461866
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000633
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000612
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152114
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000386
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 22, 2020Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been observed in individuals with CDH1-related cancers (Bodian 2014, Yurgelun 2017, Hakkaart 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28135145, 24728327, 25428177, 29589180) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoFeb 07, 2024The CDH1 c.1214A>G (p.Asn405Ser) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28135145 (2017)), and breast cancer (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/CDH1)). This variant has been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 24728327 (2014), 29589180 (2019), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/CDH1)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000044 (5/113764 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 07, 2020This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 405 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 28135145) and in healthy control individuals (PMID: 24728327, 29589180). This variant has been identified in 7/251488 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 12, 2018Variant summary: CDH1 c.1214A>G (p.Asn405Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the 3rd Cadherin domain of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.2e-05 in 247626 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.14 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), suggesting the variant may be benign. The c.1214A>G variant has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer, however these reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about an association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and all laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 19, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.41
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.97
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.042
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.072
Sift
Benign
0.080
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.51
P;.;.;.
Vest4
0.22
MutPred
0.33
Gain of glycosylation at N405 (P = 0.0084);Gain of glycosylation at N405 (P = 0.0084);Gain of glycosylation at N405 (P = 0.0084);Gain of glycosylation at N405 (P = 0.0084);
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.61
D
GERP RS
2.6
Varity_R
0.057
gMVP
0.37

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587778175; hg19: chr16-68847292; COSMIC: COSV55727918; COSMIC: COSV55727918; API