rs587778229

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):c.3334A>G(p.Asn1112Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000558 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N1112N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000058 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.63

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV58626859

Genes affected

DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]

DICER1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

DICER1-related tumor predisposition
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
pleuropulmonary blastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
DICER1 syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
global developmental delay - lung cysts - overgrowth - Wilms tumor syndrome
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

DICER1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025485158).

BP6

Variant 14-95104062-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95104062-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 133969.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000328 (5/152280) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.000965 (5/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00038. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DICER1	NM_177438.3 link	c.3334A>G	p.Asn1112Asp	missense_variant	Exon 21 of 27	ENST00000343455.8	NP_803187.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DICER1	ENST00000343455.8 link	c.3334A>G	p.Asn1112Asp	missense_variant	Exon 21 of 27	1	NM_177438.3	ENSP00000343745.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000329

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000963

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000718

AC:

AN:

250782

AF XY:

0.0000590

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000979

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000581

AC:

AN:

1461810

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000578

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00212

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53388

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111978

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60390

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

152280

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41552

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000965

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.555

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000533

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

ExAC

AF:

0.000107

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

DICER1-related tumor predisposition

Benign:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jan 19, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

- -

Jul 01, 2019

Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

ACMG criteria met: BS1, BP1, BP4 -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Oct 18, 2022

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 30093976, 26241669, 29762508) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Mar 21, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.062

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.52

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.84

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.85

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.71

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.85

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

.;.;T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.025

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

L;L;L;L;L

PhyloP100

3.6

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.37

N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.54

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;B;B;.

Vest4

0.21

MutPred

0.13

Gain of phosphorylation at S1111 (P = 0.1146);Gain of phosphorylation at S1111 (P = 0.1146);Gain of phosphorylation at S1111 (P = 0.1146);Gain of phosphorylation at S1111 (P = 0.1146);Gain of phosphorylation at S1111 (P = 0.1146);

MVP

0.39

MPC

0.56

ClinPred

0.023

GERP RS

3.4

Varity_R

0.037

gMVP

0.15

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over