rs587778236
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):c.1912G>A(p.Ala638Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000248 in 1,614,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001005361.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM2 | NM_001005361.3 | c.1912G>A | p.Ala638Thr | missense_variant | 18/21 | ENST00000389253.9 | NP_001005361.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNM2 | ENST00000389253.9 | c.1912G>A | p.Ala638Thr | missense_variant | 18/21 | 5 | NM_001005361.3 | ENSP00000373905 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 23, 2016 | The A638T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. It was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The A638T variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, this substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved, and in silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Sep 17, 2019 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 08, 2023 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 638 of the DNM2 protein (p.Ala638Thr). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Invitae). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 133981). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on DNM2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at