rs587778336
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_021922.3(FANCE):c.94G>A(p.Ala32Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 151,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021922.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCE | NM_021922.3 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000229769.3 | NP_068741.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCE | ENST00000229769.3 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_021922.3 | ENSP00000229769.2 | ||
FANCE | ENST00000696264.1 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 1/8 | ENSP00000512511.1 | ||||
FANCE | ENST00000648059.1 | n.94G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/11 | ENSP00000497902.1 | |||||
FANCE | ENST00000696265.1 | n.94G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/9 | ENSP00000512512.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1105166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 528306
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74254
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at