rs587778416
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000215.4(JAK3):c.94G>A(p.Ala32Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000323 in 1,610,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000215.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAK3 | NM_000215.4 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 2/24 | ENST00000458235.7 | NP_000206.2 | |
JAK3 | XM_047438786.1 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 2/24 | XP_047294742.1 | ||
JAK3 | XM_011527991.3 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 2/14 | XP_011526293.2 | ||
JAK3 | XR_007066796.1 | n.144G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/20 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAK3 | ENST00000458235.7 | c.94G>A | p.Ala32Thr | missense_variant | 2/24 | 5 | NM_000215.4 | ENSP00000391676 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000414 AC: 1AN: 241482Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 131822
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000350 AC: 51AN: 1458018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000331 AC XY: 24AN XY: 725124
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152082Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74308
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at