rs587778524
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):āc.1631T>Cā(p.Ile544Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,534 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1631T>C | p.Ile544Thr | missense_variant | 10/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1631T>C | p.Ile544Thr | missense_variant | 10/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251244Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135816
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461534Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727080
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 31, 2023 | Variant summary: MSH2 c.1631T>C (p.Ile544Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS, core domain (IPR007696) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251244 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1631T>C in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classifed the variant either as uncertain significance(n=1) or likely benign(n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Sep 26, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2020 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30798936, 24728327) - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 18, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 23, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at