rs587778761
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_004628.5(XPC):c.736C>T(p.Pro246Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000748 in 1,604,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004628.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPC | NM_004628.5 | c.736C>T | p.Pro246Ser | missense_variant | 6/16 | ENST00000285021.12 | NP_004619.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPC | ENST00000285021.12 | c.736C>T | p.Pro246Ser | missense_variant | 6/16 | 1 | NM_004628.5 | ENSP00000285021 | P1 | |
XPC-AS1 | ENST00000627116.2 | n.457-405G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000859 AC: 2AN: 232856Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 125864
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000551 AC: 8AN: 1451850Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000693 AC XY: 5AN XY: 721124
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74364
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group C Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Nov 02, 2017 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at