rs587780009

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):​c.465-4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000582 in 1,598,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000062 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00005752
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.575

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
STK11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial pancreatic carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 19-1220369-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1220369-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 127703.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000615 (89/1446234) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00037 (31/83784). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000267. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 57 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 89 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
STK11NM_000455.5 linkc.465-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 9 ENST00000326873.12 NP_000446.1 Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11NM_001407255.1 linkc.465-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 8 NP_001394184.1
STK11NR_176325.1 linkn.1732-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
STK11ENST00000326873.12 linkc.465-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 9 1 NM_000455.5 ENSP00000324856.6 Q15831-1
STK11ENST00000652231.1 linkc.465-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 8 ENSP00000498804.1 Q15831-2
STK11ENST00000585748.3 linkc.93-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 11 3 ENSP00000477641.2 A0A087WT72
STK11ENST00000593219.6 linkn.*290-4G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 10 3 ENSP00000466610.1 K7EMR0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000850
AC:
19
AN:
223438
AF XY:
0.0000988
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000199
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000180
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000615
AC:
89
AN:
1446234
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000794
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
718004
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000601
AC:
2
AN:
33280
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
5
AN:
42510
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000388
AC:
1
AN:
25746
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39118
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000370
AC:
31
AN:
83784
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000196
AC:
1
AN:
51074
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000348
AC:
2
AN:
5742
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000389
AC:
43
AN:
1105176
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000669
AC:
4
AN:
59804
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.527
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000109
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000491
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:4
Jan 26, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jan 21, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2014
Pathway Genomics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 14, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 13, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: STK11 c.465-4G>A alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.5e-05 in 223438 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0004 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 64 fold of the estimated maximal estimated allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in STK11 causing Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.465-4G>A has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (Aretz_2005), however authors are unclear about the possible splice impact. These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Thirteen clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified as Benign (n=1), Likely Benign (n=7) and VUS (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Dec 15, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: This is a splice variant in intron 3 of STK11 (10 total exons). The variant has been reported in one individual with Peutz Jeghers (Aretz 2005). This variant is has a Max MAF of 0.07% in ExAC (7 South Asian alleles) and 0.04% in gnomAD (12 South Asian alleles). Classified as Likely benign by 3 submitters (GeneDx, Ambry, Invitae) and VUS by Pathway Genomics. -

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Apr 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 22, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 16, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 12, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 22, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16287113, 28873162) -

Sep 01, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Jan 17, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast carcinoma Uncertain:1
Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The STK11 c.465-4G>A variant was identified in 1 of 142 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.007) from individuals or families with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (Aretz 2005). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs587780009) as "With other allele", ClinVar (2x uncertain significance, 3x likely benign), Clinvitae, and the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 19 of 220968 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include other in 1 of 5028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 4 of 31136 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 2 of 99398 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 9228 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 11 of 27928 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004). The variant was not observed in the African, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The identification of this variant together with a co-occurring pathogenic variant in the PALB2 gene (c.661_662delinsTA, p.Val221X) by our laboratory in one individual with breast cancer increases the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. The c.465-4G>A variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions nor at positions -3 and -5 to -12 which are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
-0.57
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.3
Mutation Taster
=34/66
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000058
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780009; hg19: chr19-1220368; API