rs587780112

Positions:

• chr16-68815554-G-A
• chr16-68815554-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1360G>A (p.Val454Ile) variant results in a conservative missense change in the Cadherin 3 domain of CDH1. This variant was observed in 4 in 152,164 alleles in the gnomAD v3.1.2 population database. However, this variants has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without GC, DGC, gastric SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/22/2023) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA288034/MONDO:0100488/007

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000038 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 missense
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:7 B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 3.94

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.1360G>A	p.Val454Ile	missense_variant	10/16	ENST00000261769.10
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.1177G>A	p.Val393Ile	missense_variant	9/15
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.-189G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	10/16
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.-460G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	10/15

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.1360G>A	p.Val454Ile	missense_variant	10/16	1	NM_004360.5	P1
	ENST00000563916.1	n.347+22C>T		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4 AN: 152164 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6 AN: 251472 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3 AN XY: 135908

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000376 AC: 55 AN: 1461844 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000330 AC XY: 24 AN XY: 727222

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000423

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4 AN: 152164 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2 AN XY: 74332

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Bravo AF: 0.0000189

ExAC AF: 0.0000330 AC: 4

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7 Benign:3

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:3 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto	Aug 01, 2022	BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Mar 07, 2023	This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Jun 13, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 28, 2024	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2 Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Nov 15, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Apr 03, 2023	This missense variant replaces valine with isoleucine at codon 454 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 6/246246 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Aug 17, 2021	- -

not provided Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Aug 04, 2023	In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals and families with breast cancer (PMIDs: 36436516 (2023), 33471991 (2021), 25186627 (2015)), as well as healthy, unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/CDH1)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00011 (4/35440 chromosomes in Latino/Admixed American subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 07, 2022	In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 22850631) -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1

Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel

curation

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Aug 03, 2023

The c.1360G>A (p.Val454Ile) variant results in a conservative missense change in the Cadherin 3 domain of CDH1. This variant was observed in 4 in 152,164 alleles in the gnomAD v3.1.2 population database. However, this variants has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without GC, DGC, gastric SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as Likely Benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 05/22/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.085
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.20	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.30
CADD	Benign	21
DANN	Uncertain	0.99
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.23	T;T;T;.;.
Eigen	Benign	-0.0040
Eigen_PC	Benign	0.048
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.97	D
LIST_S2	Benign	0.78	T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP	Benign	0.023	T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.24	T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.98	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	1.2	L;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	D;D
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.50	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-0.63	N;.;.;.;N
REVEL	Benign	0.17
Sift	Benign	0.16	T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G	Benign	0.099	T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen		0.21	B;.;.;.;.
Vest4		0.34
MutPred		0.51		Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.1571);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.1571);.;Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.1571);.;
MVP		0.69
MPC		0.34
ClinPred		0.17	T
GERP RS		5.7
Varity_R		0.077
gMVP		0.27

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780112; hg19: chr16-68849457;