Menu
GeneBe

rs587780190

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM1PP3

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.906A>C(p.Glu302Asp) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000974 in 1,437,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E302K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

2
11
5
Splicing: ADA: 0.0006935
2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.997
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 17 uncertain in NM_007194.4
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.761

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.906A>C p.Glu302Asp missense_variant, splice_region_variant 8/15 ENST00000404276.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.906A>C p.Glu302Asp missense_variant, splice_region_variant 8/151 NM_007194.4 P2O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152148
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000296
AC:
6
AN:
202734
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000459
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
108872
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000688
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000101
AC:
13
AN:
1285706
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
20
AF XY:
0.0000109
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
644066
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000508
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000830
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000184
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152148
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74344
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.0000249
AC:
3

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 30, 2023The p.E302D variant (also known as c.906A>C), located in coding exon 7 of the CHEK2 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 906. The glutamic acid at codon 302 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in 1/5589 German BRCA1/2-negative probands diagnosed with breast cancer (Hauke J et al. Cancer Med, 2018 Apr;7:1349-1358). This alteration behaved as semi-functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum Mutat, 2019 05;40:631-648). This alteration has also been reported in 2/1197 individuals from Greece, Romania, and Turkey undergoing evaluation for inherited cancer predisposition (Tsaousis GN et al. BMC Cancer, 2019 Jun;19:535). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 28, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with aspartic acid at codon 302 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has demonstrated an intermediate impact of this variant on CHEK2 protein function in a yeast-based DNA damage response assay (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 29522266, 30613976). In a large breast cancer case-control meta analysis conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 3/60466 cases and 3/53461 unaffected controls (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID CHEK2_000406). This variant has been identified in 8/234112 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 23, 2018Variant summary: CHEK2 c.906A>C (p.Glu302Asp) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Protein kinase domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.5e-05 in 228952 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (3.5e-05 vs 0.00031), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.906A>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 09, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 06, 2022Published functional studies are inconclusive: intermediate response to DNA damage (Delimitsou 2019); Identified in individuals with personal or family history of breast/ovarian cancer (Rizzolo 2019, Tsaousis 2019, Vargas-Parra 2020); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as c.1035A>C; p.Glu345Asp; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31159747, 22419737, 19782031, 32906215, 30613976, 33320972, 30851065) -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 302 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Glu302Asp). This variant is present in population databases (rs587780190, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with CHEK2-related cancers (PMID: 30613976, 31159747). This variant is also known as c.1035A>C p.Glu345Asp. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 128087). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsSep 24, 2023- -
CHEK2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 08, 2023The CHEK2 c.906A>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu302Asp. This variant was reported in an individual with male breast cancer and individuals undergoing genetic testing for hereditary cancer predisposition (Table S5, Tsaousis et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31159747; Table S3, referred to as c.1035A>C (p.Glu345Asp), Rizzolo et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30613976; Table S1, Vargas-Parra et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32906215). Experimental studies using a yeast-based system suggest this variant is semi-functional (Table 1, Delimitsou et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30851065). This variant is reported in 0.0067% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/22-29099495-T-G) and is interpreted as uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/128087/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Carcinoma of colon Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The CHEK2 p.Glu302Asp variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs587780190) as “with uncertain significance allele” and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Color, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and 3 other submitters). The variant was identified in control databases in 8 of 234,112 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 2 of 29,918 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007) and European in 6 of 101,258 chromosomes (freq: 0.00006), while the variant was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, Other or South Asian populations. The p.Glu302 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The p.Glu302Asp variant occurs in the last codon of the exon. This position has been shown to be part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving this position sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Familial cancer of breast;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C1836482:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsJul 27, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.76
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.053
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.020
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.35
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.33
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.29
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.048
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.76
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;L;L;.;L;.;L;.;L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.75
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.41
Sift
Uncertain
0.015
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.013
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D;D;.;.
Polyphen
0.95
P;D;P;.;P;D;P;D;D;.;.;.
Vest4
0.91
MutPred
0.81
Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);.;Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);.;Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);.;Gain of sheet (P = 0.1451);.;.;.;
MVP
0.80
MPC
0.054
ClinPred
0.71
D
GERP RS
3.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.79
gMVP
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00069
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.25
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780190; hg19: chr22-29099495; API