rs587780247
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.316C>T(p.Arg106Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000675 in 1,613,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032043.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | NM_032043.3 | c.316C>T | p.Arg106Cys | missense_variant | 4/20 | ENST00000259008.7 | NP_114432.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRIP1 | ENST00000259008.7 | c.316C>T | p.Arg106Cys | missense_variant | 4/20 | 1 | NM_032043.3 | ENSP00000259008 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000111 AC: 28AN: 251452Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000664 AC: 97AN: 1461730Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 54AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74328
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 06, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 15, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Nov 23, 2020 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 02, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 14, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 20, 2022 | The p.R106C variant (also known as c.316C>T), located in coding exon 3 of the BRIP1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 316. The arginine at codon 106 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration was observed within 1 of 13213 individuals with a personal history of breast cancer and 1/5242 controls (Easton DF et al. J Med Genet, 2016 05;53:298-309). It was also reported in a family in which the variant was present in two siblings affected with breast cancer and absent from two cancer-free siblings (Grasel RS et al. Front Oncol, 2020 Oct;10:571330). This variant has been reported in a familial prostate cancer kindred and in one individual with colorectal cancer diagnosed under age 50 (Ray AM et al. Br. J. Cancer. 2009 Dec;101:2043-7; Pearlman R et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr;3:464-471). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 19, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 22, 2021 | - - |
Ovarian neoplasm Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington | Nov 22, 2019 | This variant has been identified in individuals with breast, colon and prostate cancer (Ray 2009, Easton 2016, Pearlman 2017), but has not to our knowledge been reported in an individual with ovarian cancer. The majority of pathogenic variants reported in the BRIP1 gene to date are truncating variants. This variant has an overall allele frequency of 0.0001 in the Broad Institute ExAC Browser (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/). In silico analyses indicate that this variant may not alter protein structure/function. Thus, it is unknown at this time whether this variant increases cancer risk. BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 06, 2016 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 02, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 23, 2024 | In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, or colon cancer, but also in unaffected controls (PMID: 19935797, 26921362, 27978560, 33134171, 35264596); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19935797, 27978560, 26921362, 28492532, 26689913, 33134171, 32522261, 35264596) - |
BRIP1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 14, 2022 | The BRIP1 c.316C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg106Cys. This variant was reported in individuals with prostate cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, or colon cancer (Table 3, Ray et al. 2009. PubMed ID: 19935797; Supplementary data set 12, Lu et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26689913; eTable 2, Pearlman et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27978560). This variant was also reported as uncertain in a cohort study of hereditary cancer testing (Table S1, Velázquez. 2020. PubMed ID: 32522261). In a case control study, this variant was identified in one individual with breast cancer and found in one unaffected individual (Table S1, Easton et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 26921362). In addition, a different variant affecting the same amino acid (p.Arg106His) was reported in individuals with rectum cancer/pancreatic adenocarcinoma (eTable 2, Pearlman et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27978560; Shindo. 2017. PubMed ID: 28767289). This variant is reported in 0.020% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-59934482-G-A) and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from likely benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/128184/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 19, 2017 | Variant summary: The BRIP1 c.316C>T (p.Arg106Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). The variant was found in the control population dataset of gnomAD in 32/287682 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the Latino subpopulation at a frequency of 0.000203 (7/34416). This frequency is about 3 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRIP1 variant (0.0000625), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of Latino origin. The variant has been reported in affected individuals in the literature, without strong evidence for causality (Ray_2009, Easton_2016, Pearlman_2016). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance. Taken together, based on the relatively high allele frequency of the variant in the control population, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at