rs587780361
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001101426.4(CRPPA):c.979C>G(p.Leu327Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L327L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001101426.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPPA | NM_001101426.4 | c.979C>G | p.Leu327Val | missense_variant | 7/10 | ENST00000407010.7 | |
CRPPA-AS1 | NR_038947.1 | n.241-7260G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPPA | ENST00000407010.7 | c.979C>G | p.Leu327Val | missense_variant | 7/10 | 5 | NM_001101426.4 | P1 | |
CRPPA-AS1 | ENST00000438573.5 | n.222-2932G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Sep 25, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 05, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 06, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at