rs587780742

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.1102+9A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000218 in 1,613,718 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.221

Variant links:

Genes affected

MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

MUTYH links:

ENSG00000288208 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288208 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).

BP6

Variant 1-45331652-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45331652-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135981.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr1-45331652-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MUTYH	NM_001048174.2 link	c.1102+9A>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 15	ENST00000456914.7	NP_001041639.1	Q9UIF7-6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MUTYH	ENST00000456914.7 link	c.1102+9A>T		intron_variant	Intron 12 of 15	1	NM_001048174.2	ENSP00000407590.2		Q9UIF7-6
ENSG00000288208	ENST00000671898.1 link	n.1690+9A>T		intron_variant	Intron 16 of 20			ENSP00000499896.1		A0A5F9ZGZ0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000108

AC:

AN:

249362

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000111

AC XY:

AN XY:

135456

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000648

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000212

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000223

AC:

326

AN:

1461404

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000226

AC XY:

164

AN XY:

727022

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000189

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000188

AC XY:

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000308

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000128

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Apr 12, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 11, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

To the best of our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00024 (12/50532 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect MUTYH mRNA splicing . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial adenomatous polyposis 2

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Oct 28, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

Dec 11, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 10, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Oct 08, 2024

Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BP4, BP7 MUTYH c.1186+9A>T is an intronic variant not very close to a canonical splice site, where the SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP4 and BP7).This variant is found in 23/ 117542, with a filter allele frequency of 0.013% at 99% confidence in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database (European non-Finish non-cancer data set). In addition, the variant was identified in the ClinVar database (11x likely benign, 2, uncertain significance, 1x benign) and (2x VUS, 2x likely benign) in the LOVD database. To our knowledge, neither relevant clinical data nor functional studies have been reported for this variant. Based on currently available information, the variant c.1186+9A>T is classified as a likely benign variant according to ACMG guidelines. -

Jun 20, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 02, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

7.7

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over