rs587781179

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.1296G>A(p.Gln432Gln) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000316 in 1,529,578 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00033 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 19-1226641-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1226641-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 139339.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-1226641-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00019 (29/152256) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000338 (23/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00023. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 29 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 link	c.1296G>A	p.Gln432Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 10	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NR_176325.1 link	n.2563G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 10 of 11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 link	c.1296G>A	p.Gln432Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 10	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6		Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 link	c.924G>A	p.Gln308Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	3		ENSP00000477641.2		A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000190

AC:

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000723

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000168

AC:

AN:

131024

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000181

AC XY:

AN XY:

71894

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000406

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000264

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000330

AC:

454

AN:

1377322

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000295

AC XY:

200

AN XY:

678032

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000916

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000405

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000281

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000190

AC:

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74386

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000723

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.000287

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000162

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

STK11: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1296G>A (p.Gln432=) in STK11 affects a non-conserved nucleotide and 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect multiple ESE sites. However, no functional studies confirming these predictions were published at the time of evaluation. This variant is found in 1/11504 control chromosomes of ExAC at a frequency of 0.000086 and 28/157510 chrs tested in gnomAD dataset. These frequencies exceed the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000056), suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. -

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Dec 14, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 02, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 09, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Feb 17, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.95

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.43

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DG_spliceai

0.43

Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over