rs587781329
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.160A>G (p.Arg54Gly) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00002737 (5 of 182,668) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004080 (3 of 73,538) in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >50 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000183777.5, SCV000545364.6, SCV000210888.14). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA293951/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.160A>G | p.Arg54Gly | missense_variant | 2/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.160A>G | p.Arg54Gly | missense_variant | 2/15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1456A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1660A>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 2/15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.160A>G | p.Arg54Gly | missense_variant | 2/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 | ||
CDH1 | ENST00000422392.6 | c.160A>G | p.Arg54Gly | missense_variant | 2/15 | 1 | ENSP00000414946.2 | |||
CDH1 | ENST00000566612.5 | n.160A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/15 | 1 | ENSP00000454782.1 | ||||
CDH1 | ENST00000566510.5 | n.160A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/15 | 5 | ENSP00000458139.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000264 AC: 4AN: 151304Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000374 AC XY: 3AN XY: 80284
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000194 AC: 27AN: 1392146Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000233 AC XY: 16AN XY: 686140
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 23, 2023 | The CDH1 c.160A>G (p.Arg54Gly) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast cancer (PMIDs: 25186627 (2015), 28202063 (2017)) and other CDH1-associated cancer (PMID: 36436516 (2023)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000041 (3/73538 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 16, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with a personal or family history including breast or ovarian cancer (Tung et al., 2015; Jalkh et al., 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24908143, 28202063, 28873162, 25186627, 15235021) - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 18, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 03, 2023 | This missense variant replaces arginine with glycine at codon 54 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 28202063), hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (PMID: 36436516), and unspecified cancer (PMID: 36436516). This variant has also been observed in over ten individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome (Color internal data). This variant has been identified in 5/182668 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This variant does not appear to be associated with disease but additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
CDH1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 06, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 17, 2023 | The c.160A>G (p.Arg54Gly) missense variant has a frequency of 0.00002737 (5 of 182,668) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 cohort, with a maximum non-founder allele frequency of 0.00004080 (3 of 73,538) in the non-Finnish European subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in >50 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000183777.5, SCV000545364.6, SCV000210888.14). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at