rs587781377
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3
The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.451G>T(p.Gly151Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000658 in 152,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G151S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007194.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- CHEK2-related cancer predispositionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- acute myeloid leukemiaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152068Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251322 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152068Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74286 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3
This sequence change replaces glycine with cysteine at codon 151 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Gly151Cys). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a CHEK2-related disease. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140928) with 4 submissions, all of which describe this variant as of uncertain significance. Pathogenic computational verdict based on 10 pathogenic predictions from BayesDel_addAF, DANN, DEOGEN2, FATHMM-MKL, LIST-S2, M-CAP, MVP, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster and SIFT vs 2 benign predictions from EIGEN and PrimateAI and the glycine residue is highly conserved. In summary, this variant has uncertain impact on CHEK2 function. The available evidence is currently insufficient to determine its role in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 151 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Gly151Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs587781377, gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 32658311). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140928). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
The p.G151C variant (also known as c.451G>T), located in coding exon 3 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 451. The glycine at codon 151 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration behaved as functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum Mutat, 2019 May;40:631-648). This variant was reported as functional in a study assessing CHEK2-complementation through quantification of KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells (Stolarova L et al. Clin Cancer Res, 2023 Aug;29:3037-3050). This alteration was seen in 1/732 breast cancer patients, 0/189 colorectal cancer patients and 0/490 cancer-free elderly controls in a Turkish population (Akcay IM et al. Int J Cancer, 2021 Jan;148:285-295). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -
- -
This missense variant replaces glycine with cysteine at codon 151 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has reported the mutant protein to be functional in DNA damage response assay in yeast (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with lung cancer (PMID: 29866652). This variant has been identified in 1/251322 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/251322 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 32658311 (2021)), as well as in the somatic state in an individual with lung cancer (PMID: 29866652 (2018)). One yeast-based functional assay demonstrated that this variant had a growth rate similar to the positive control, suggesting a non-damaging effect (PMID: 30851065 (2019)). Additional studies are needed to determine the overall impact of this variant on gene and gene product. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: growth rate comparable to wild-type in a yeast-based assay (Delimitsou 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19782031, 22419737, 30851065) -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at