rs587781388
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PM4_Supporting
The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.262_264delTGT(p.Cys88del) variant causes a conservative inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,613,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. C88C) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032043.3 conservative_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina
- Fanconi anemia complementation group JInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- colorectal adenomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251452 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461602Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727108 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
The BRIP1 c.262_264del (p.Cys88del) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289 (2017)) and breast cancer (PMID: 26976419 (2016)). The variant has also been reported in reportedly healthy individuals (PMIDs: 31214711 (2020) and 36243179 (2022)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00002 (5/251452 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
In-frame deletion of one amino acid in a non-repeat region; Observed in individuals with breast and pancreatic cancer (Tung et al., 2016; Shindo et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2020); In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26976419, 28767289, 31214711, 32659497) -
Curator: Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Yukihide Momozawa. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
The c.262_264delTGT variant (also known as p.C88del) is located in coding exon 3 of the BRIP1 gene. This variant results from an in-frame TGT deletion at nucleotide positions 262 to 264. This results in the in-frame deletion of a cysteine at codon 88. This alteration has been reported in a cohort of 488 patients with stages I to III breast cancer who were tested with a 25-gene panel test (Tung N et al. J Clin Oncol, 2016 May;34:1460-8). This alteration was also identified in a cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer or other periampullary neoplasms tested for hereditary cancer risk via a multi-gene panel (Shindo K et al. J Clin Oncol, 2017 Oct;35:3382-3390). This alteration has been reported with a carrier frequency of 0.00026 in 7636 unselected prostate cancer patients and 0.00008 in 12366 male controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2020 04;112:369-376). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive (Choi Y et al. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(10):e46688). Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
There is insufficient or conflicting evidence for classification of this alteration. -
This variant causes an in-frame deletion of one amino acid (codon 88) in the BRIP1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 26976419), two individuals affected with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28767289) and two individuals affected with prostate cancer (PMID: 31214711). This variant has been identified in 5/251452 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and in a control individual (PMID: 31214711). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
The BRIP1 c.262_264del (p.Cys88del) change has a maximum subpopulation frequency 0.012% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The change results in the deletion of a single cysteine residue in a region without a known function at the N-terminal end of the BRIP1 gene. This variant has been reported in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 26976419), as well as in individuals affected with pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer (PMID: 28767289, 31214711). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with ovarian cancer or Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: BRIP1 c.262_264delTGT (p.Cys88del) results in an in-frame deletion that is predicted to remove one amino acid from the encoded protein. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 251452 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.262_264delTGT has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with pancreatic cancer, breast cancer or prostate cancer, as well as in controls (Shindo_2017, Tung_2016, Momozawa_2020, Okawa_2023). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 28767289, 26976419, 36243179, 31214711). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140945). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Uncertain:1
This variant, c.262_264del, results in the deletion of 1 amino acid(s) of the BRIP1 protein (p.Cys88del), but otherwise preserves the integrity of the reading frame. This variant is present in population databases (rs587781388, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer (PMID: 26976419, 28767289, 31214711). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140945). Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
BRIP1-related disorder Uncertain:1
The BRIP1 c.262_264delTGT variant is predicted to result in an in-frame deletion (p.Cys88del). This variant has been reported in at least three individuals with different types of cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Shindo et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28767289; breast cancer, Tung et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 26976419; prostate cancer, search rs587781388 in Table S6, Momozawa et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 31214711). This variant is reported in 0.012% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD and is classified as a variant of uncertain significance in the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/140945/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
The BRIP1 p.Cys88del variant was identified in 1 of 976 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with stage I to III breast cancer (Tung 2016). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs587781388) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (6x as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Invitae, Color Genomics, Laboratory Corporation of America), and Cosmic (reported 1x as confirmed somatic Carcinoma in Endometrium). The variant was not identified in MutDB, or the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 5 of 246232 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: African in 2 of 15304 chromosomes (freq: 0.00013), South Asian in 1 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.000032), European (Non-Finnish) in 2 of 111694 chromosomes (freq: 0.000018); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, Latino, and other populations. The c.262_264del variant is an in-frame deletion resulting in the removal of a cysteine (cys) residue at codon 88; the impact of this alteration on BRIP1 protein function is not known. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at