rs587781497
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 4P and 10B. PM1PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9043A>G(p.Lys3015Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,418 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K3015I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Fanconi anemia complementation group D1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, G2P
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- sarcomaInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- medulloblastomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.9043A>G | p.Lys3015Glu | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.9043A>G | p.Lys3015Glu | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.8674A>G | p.Lys2892Glu | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1101A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 22 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 | ||||
| BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.*1101A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 22 of 26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250458 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461418Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727016 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
This missense variant replaces lysine with glutamic acid at codon 3015 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been performed for this variant. This variant has been reported in a multifactorial analysis as benign based on co-occurrence and family history likelihood ratios (PMID: 31131967). This variant has also been reported in individual(s) who underwent BRCA genetic testing (PMID: 29310832). This variant has been identified in 1/250458 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:2
IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000831 -
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9043A>G (p.Lys3015Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the OB3 domain (IPR015188) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 250458 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.9043A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS or Likely benign change in a setting of multigene testing in at least two individuals affected with breast/ovarian cancer (e.g. Apessos_2018, Matta_2022). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Several publications have used a variety of predictive models to classify the variant as part of the CAGI5 (fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation) ENIGMA Challenge. These models include a prediction protocol that incorporates several assessments of the impact of this variant on splicing and protein function (Padilla_2019), a multifactorial likelihood model which uses clinical data such as co-occurrences and co-segregation to predict pathogenicity (Parsons_2019), as well as a number of predictive models developed by six different teams which use a variety of methods including machine learning which consider structural and functional predictors often in addition to clinical data (Cline_2019). In each of these publications, the variant was given a classification of benign. However, these predictions have yet to confirmed with functional studies, as to our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 29310832, 31294896, 36329109, 31112341, 31131967). Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments (VUS (n=2), benign (n=2)/likely benign (n=3)). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
not provided Uncertain:1
This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.9043A>G at the cDNA level, p.Lys3015Glu (K3015E) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Lysine to a Glutamic Acid (AAA>GAA). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 9271A>G. This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. BRCA2 Lys3015Glu was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, suggesting it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Lysine and Glutamic Acid differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. BRCA2 Lys3015Glu occurs at a position that is not conserved and is located in the DNA binding domain (Borg 2010). In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Lys3015Glu is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at