rs587781536
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5590G>A(p.Asp1864Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000344 in 1,454,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1864G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5590G>A | p.Asp1864Asn | missense_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5590G>A | p.Asp1864Asn | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.5221G>A | p.Asp1741Asn | missense_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.5590G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000122 AC: 3AN: 246000Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000150 AC XY: 2AN XY: 132956
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000344 AC: 5AN: 1454548Hom.: 0 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.00000553 AC XY: 4AN XY: 722842
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 14, 2022 | This missense variant replaces aspartic acid with asparagine at codon 1864 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in multiple individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 26852015, 27257965, 28111427, 30725392, 31161121, 33078592, 35402282), an individual affected with esophageal cancer (PMID: 22126563), and two individuals affected with colorectal cancer (PMID: 31428572). In a large breast cancer case-control meta analysis, this variant was reported in 3/60466 cases and 2/53461 unaffected controls; (OR=1.326 (95%CI 0.222 to 7.938); Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_006877 (PMID: 33471991)). This variant has been identified in 3/246000 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 22, 2024 | The p.D1864N variant (also known as c.5590G>A), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 5590. The aspartic acid at codon 1864 is replaced by asparagine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was identified in a 66-year-old Chinese male diagnosed with with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had no family history of cancer but did have a personal history of tobacco use (Zhong L et al. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2011;12:1771-6). This variant was also identified in multiple individuals of Asian descent diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Cao WM et al. BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb;16:64; Zhong X et al. PLoS ONE. 2016 Jun;11:e0156789; Kim HN et al. Chonnam Med J, 2019 May;55:99-103; Zhunussova G et al. Front Oncol, 2019 Aug;9:673; Abdel-Razeq H et al. Front Oncol, 2022 Mar;12:673094). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 27, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5590G>A (p.Asp1864Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the BRCA2 repeat (IPR002093) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.9e-05 in 268772 control chromosomes (gnomAD, Dong_2021). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5590G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with esophageal cancer (Zhong_2011), and Breast/Ovarian cancer (Zhong_2016, Cao_2016, Park_2017, So_2019, Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. A multi-factorial analysis of ethnic Koreans by Lee_2018 produced a combined likelihood ratio of 0.023, leading the authors to conclude the variant is "likely benign". To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: all have classified the variant as of uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University | Nov 01, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1864 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Asp1864Asn). This variant is present in population databases (rs587781536, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and/or ovarian cancer and in an individual with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PMID: 22126563, 26852015, 27257965, 30415210, 30725392, 31161121, 31907386). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141155). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at