rs587781701

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2017C>A(p.Gln673Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000651 in 1,613,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000069 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.93

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

ENSG00000260798 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260798 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.28850138).

BP6

Variant 16-68823479-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68823479-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141376.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=7}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 101 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.2017C>A	p.Gln673Lys	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.1834C>A	p.Gln612Lys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.469C>A	p.Gln157Lys	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.52C>A	p.Gln18Lys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.2017C>A	p.Gln673Lys	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152032

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000278

AC:

AN:

251476

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000441

AC XY:

AN XY:

135910

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000527

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000691

AC:

101

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000784

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000863

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152032

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74254

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000340

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jul 03, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with a personal or family history of breast cancer (Garcia-Pelaez et al., 2023); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021, 22850631, 36436516) -

Feb 24, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Not applicable criteria (PMID: 30311375) -

Jan 14, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Nov 15, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 07, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces glutamine with lysine at codon 673 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 7/251476 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Apr 23, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.2017C>A (p.Gln673Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 251476 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2017C>A in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. c.2017C>A was detected in 2/9884 individuals in the FLOSSIES database (women older than age 70 without cancer). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141376). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

Jul 20, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Jul 16, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.2017C>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gln673Lys. This variant has been reported in the literature in an individual with a family history of breast cancer (Garcia-Pelaez J et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36436516). This variant is reported in 0.0053% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance by the vast majority of submitters in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/141376/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1

Mar 25, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.15

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.0076

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.10

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Benign

0.84

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.31

T;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.42

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.42

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

LIST_S2

Benign

0.69

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.042

MetaRNN

Benign

0.29

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.52

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.8

M;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.48

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.9

N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.095

T;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.15

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.94

P;.;.

Vest4

0.48

MutPred

0.48

Gain of methylation at Q673 (P = 0.0262);.;.;

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.80

ClinPred

0.38

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.31

gMVP

0.74

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over