rs587782571
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_004360.5(CDH1):āc.440C>Gā(p.Pro147Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.440C>G | p.Pro147Arg | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.440C>G | p.Pro147Arg | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1176C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 4 of 16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1380C>G | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 4 of 15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251414Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461872Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
This missense variant replaces proline with arginine at codon 147 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with CDH1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/251414 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Located in the precursor sequence domain (Brooks-Wilson et al., 2004); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15235021) -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 147 of the CDH1 protein (p.Pro147Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs587782571, gnomAD 0.0009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142592). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The arginine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at