rs58917027
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.448A>C(p.Thr150Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T150A) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_170707.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | NM_170707.4 | c.448A>C | p.Thr150Pro | missense_variant | 2/12 | ENST00000368300.9 | NP_733821.1 | |
LMNA | NM_005572.4 | c.448A>C | p.Thr150Pro | missense_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000677389.1 | NP_005563.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | ENST00000368300.9 | c.448A>C | p.Thr150Pro | missense_variant | 2/12 | 1 | NM_170707.4 | ENSP00000357283.4 | ||
LMNA | ENST00000677389.1 | c.448A>C | p.Thr150Pro | missense_variant | 2/10 | NM_005572.4 | ENSP00000503633.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 18, 2015 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 02, 2022 | For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects LMNA function (PMID: 16218190). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 48067). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy (PMID: 10908904, 20848652, 24503780, 27532257; Invitae). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 150 of the LMNA protein (p.Thr150Pro). - |
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 15, 2012 | The Thr150Pro variant (LMNA) has been previously reported in 2 individuals with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy who also had conduction system disease and was absent from 160 control chromosomes (Felice 2000, Schamer 2011). Our laboratory has identified this variant in 1 out over >500 Caucasian probands with cardiomy opathy. The variant was present in 4 affected family members, supporting a patho genic role. Consistent with a laminopathy, clinical features in this family incl ude DCM, muscle weakness and conduction system disease. Threonine (Thr) at posit ion conserved in mammals, frog, and fish (lower species not available), which su ggests that a change may not be tolerated. Computational tools (AlignGVGD and SI FT) also support a pathogenic role, though their accuracy is unknown. In summary , this variant is considered to be likely pathogenic. - |
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Epithelial Biology; Institute of Medical Biology, Singapore | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at