rs59128481

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):​c.5399+13G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0923 in 1,550,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,153 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.072 ( 526 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.095 ( 6627 hom. )

Consequence

LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.53

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LOXHD1 (HGNC:26521): (lipoxygenase homology PLAT domains 1) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein consisting entirely of PLAT (polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin) domains, thought to be involved in targeting proteins to the plasma membrane. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed in the mechanosensory hair cells in the inner ear, and mutations in this gene lead to auditory defects, indicating that this gene is essential for normal hair cell function. Screening of human families segregating deafness identified a mutation in this gene which causes DFNB77, a progressive form of autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]
LOXHD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 18-46518116-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-46518116-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47944.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0992 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001384474.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1
MANE Select
c.5399+13G>A
intron
N/ANP_001371403.1
LOXHD1
NM_144612.7
c.5213+13G>A
intron
N/ANP_653213.6
LOXHD1
NM_001145472.3
c.2066+13G>A
intron
N/ANP_001138944.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
LOXHD1
ENST00000642948.1
MANE Select
c.5399+13G>A
intron
N/AENSP00000496347.1
LOXHD1
ENST00000300591.11
TSL:1
c.2066+13G>A
intron
N/AENSP00000300591.6
LOXHD1
ENST00000579038.6
TSL:1
c.1778+13G>A
intron
N/AENSP00000463285.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0719
AC:
10928
AN:
152070
Hom.:
525
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.255
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0804
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0925
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0581
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0710
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0444
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0696
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.101
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0961
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0771
AC:
12082
AN:
156710
AF XY:
0.0795
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0546
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0981
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0600
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0454
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0882
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0946
AC:
132292
AN:
1398780
Hom.:
6627
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0944
AC XY:
65155
AN XY:
689902
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
555
AN:
31588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0563
AC:
2009
AN:
35698
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0966
AC:
2432
AN:
25178
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0388
AC:
1387
AN:
35736
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0785
AC:
6221
AN:
79206
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0488
AC:
2404
AN:
49274
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0742
AC:
391
AN:
5272
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.103
AC:
111584
AN:
1078876
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0916
AC:
5309
AN:
57952
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6200
12400
18601
24801
31001
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4086
8172
12258
16344
20430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0718
AC:
10923
AN:
152188
Hom.:
526
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0696
AC XY:
5182
AN XY:
74402
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0224
AC:
932
AN:
41536
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0802
AC:
1227
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0925
AC:
321
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0575
AC:
297
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0709
AC:
341
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0444
AC:
471
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0714
AC:
21
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.101
AC:
6880
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0951
AC:
201
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
518
1035
1553
2070
2588
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
132
264
396
528
660
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0864
Hom.:
127
Bravo
AF:
0.0722
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0580
AC:
202
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jun 13, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

not specified Benign:2
May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

5213+13G>A in Intron 33 of LOXHD1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus se quence and has been identified in 11.4% (288/2532) of European American chromoso mes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs .washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs59128481).

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
1.7
DANN
Benign
0.53
PhyloP100
-1.5
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs59128481; hg19: chr18-44098079; API