rs59935412
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_021098.3(CACNA1H):c.5840C>T(p.Pro1947Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,565,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1947P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021098.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1H | NM_021098.3 | c.5840C>T | p.Pro1947Leu | missense_variant | 33/35 | ENST00000348261.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1H | ENST00000348261.11 | c.5840C>T | p.Pro1947Leu | missense_variant | 33/35 | 1 | NM_021098.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00560 AC: 851AN: 151956Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00125 AC: 219AN: 175698Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000868 AC XY: 82AN XY: 94504
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000534 AC: 754AN: 1413110Hom.: 4 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000462 AC XY: 323AN XY: 698412
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00561 AC: 853AN: 152074Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00541 AC XY: 402AN XY: 74328
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy;C4310756:Hyperaldosteronism, familial, type IV Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 26, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at