rs6062302

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):​c.1992T>C​(p.Asp664Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.76 in 1,611,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 472,506 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.80 ( 50335 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.76 ( 422171 hom. )

Consequence

RTEL1
NM_001283009.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0150

Publications

47 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RTEL1 (HGNC:15888): (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) This gene encodes a DNA helicase which functions in the stability, protection and elongation of telomeres and interacts with proteins in the shelterin complex known to protect telomeres during DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with dyskeratosis congenita and Hoyerall-Hreidarsson syndrome. Read-through transcription of this gene into the neighboring downstream gene, which encodes tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, generates a non-coding transcript. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B (HGNC:44095): (RTEL1-TNFRSF6B readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring RTEL1 (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) and TNFRSF6B (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6b, decoy) genes on chromosome 20. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 20-63689615-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63689615-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 403398.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.015 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.93 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RTEL1NM_001283009.2 linkc.1992T>C p.Asp664Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 35 ENST00000360203.11 NP_001269938.1 Q9NZ71-6R4IXY3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RTEL1ENST00000360203.11 linkc.1992T>C p.Asp664Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 35 5 NM_001283009.2 ENSP00000353332.5 Q9NZ71-6
RTEL1ENST00000508582.7 linkc.2064T>C p.Asp688Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 35 2 ENSP00000424307.2 Q9NZ71-7
RTEL1ENST00000370018.7 linkc.1992T>C p.Asp664Asp synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 35 1 ENSP00000359035.3 Q9NZ71-1
RTEL1-TNFRSF6BENST00000492259.6 linkn.2076T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 21 of 35 5 ENSP00000457428.1 D6RA96

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.804
AC:
122186
AN:
152016
Hom.:
50274
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.938
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.814
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.772
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.756
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.299
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.725
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.800
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.785
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.776
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.797
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.742
AC:
184408
AN:
248428
AF XY:
0.743
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.943
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.737
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.757
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.286
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.803
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.780
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.755
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.756
AC:
1102831
AN:
1459594
Hom.:
422171
Cov.:
52
AF XY:
0.755
AC XY:
548568
AN XY:
726102
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.950
AC:
31792
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.736
AC:
32860
AN:
44656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.759
AC:
19805
AN:
26098
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.313
AC:
12392
AN:
39650
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.733
AC:
63217
AN:
86204
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.803
AC:
41836
AN:
52068
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.780
AC:
4492
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.766
AC:
851315
AN:
1111368
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.748
AC:
45122
AN:
60316
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13645
27291
40936
54582
68227
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20278
40556
60834
81112
101390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.804
AC:
122308
AN:
152134
Hom.:
50335
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.800
AC XY:
59499
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.938
AC:
38948
AN:
41526
American (AMR)
AF:
0.772
AC:
11809
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.756
AC:
2624
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.299
AC:
1543
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.725
AC:
3498
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.800
AC:
8475
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.799
AC:
235
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.776
AC:
52762
AN:
67954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.794
AC:
1672
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1161
2323
3484
4646
5807
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
854
1708
2562
3416
4270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.790
Hom.:
86394
Bravo
AF:
0.804
Asia WGS
AF:
0.551
AC:
1919
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

Jan 14, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30462709) -

Jul 10, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.2064T>C (p.Asp688=) in RTEL1 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this does not affect a normal splicing pattern, however no functional studies supporting these predictions were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.749 89112/119034 chrs tested), including numerous homozygous occurrences. This frequency exceeds the estimated maximum allele frequency for a pathogenic allele in this gene (0.0011). In addition, the variant is cited as Benign/Polymorphism by a reputable database/clinical laboratory. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -

Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:4
Mar 21, 2018
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This "variant" is the major allele. The T allele is also present at a high allel e frequency (25%) and would therefore also be benign. http://gnomad.broadinstitu te.org/variant/20-62320968-T-C -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 89% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 85. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5 Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3 Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5;C4225346:Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
0.66
DANN
Benign
0.84
PhyloP100
0.015
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6062302; hg19: chr20-62320968; COSMIC: COSV58894606; COSMIC: COSV58894606; API