rs606231276
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PP3_Moderate
The NM_201631.4(TGM5):c.1335G>C(p.Lys445Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000235 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201631.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acral peeling skin syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_201631.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGM5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1335G>C | p.Lys445Asn | missense | Exon 9 of 13 | ENSP00000220420.5 | O43548-1 | ||
| TGM5 | TSL:1 | c.1089G>C | p.Lys363Asn | missense | Exon 8 of 12 | ENSP00000220419.8 | O43548-2 | ||
| TGM5 | TSL:2 | n.811G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152138Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000439 AC: 11AN: 250834 AF XY: 0.0000295 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000219 AC: 32AN: 1461792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 727190 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152256Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74456 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at