rs60777199

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.9449+8T>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00421 in 1,517,426 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 218 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 127 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 91 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00006425
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.228
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 1-237702067-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237702067-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 43837.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237702067-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-237702067-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0716 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.9449+8T>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 66 of 104 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2 Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.9449+8T>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 66 of 104 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2 Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.*484+8T>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 64 of 103 5 ENSP00000499659.2 A0A590UK06
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkc.9449+8T>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 66 of 105 ENSP00000499787.2 A0A590UKB7
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkc.9449+8T>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 66 of 104 ENSP00000499653.3 A0A590UJZ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3274
AN:
152174
Hom.:
127
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0739
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00531
AC:
1296
AN:
243922
Hom.:
38
AF XY:
0.00391
AC XY:
516
AN XY:
132104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000136
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000469
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00227
AC:
3105
AN:
1365134
Hom.:
91
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
0.00195
AC XY:
1333
AN XY:
684880
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0753
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000393
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00542
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3276
AN:
152292
Hom.:
127
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0207
AC XY:
1545
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0737
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0156
Alfa
AF:
0.00671
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.0240
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

9449+8T>A in intron 66 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 7% (207/2918) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs60777199). -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Nov 06, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 04, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
5.7
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000064
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs60777199; hg19: chr1-237865367; API