Menu
GeneBe

rs61100157

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BA1

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):c.1026C>T(p.Ala342=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00278 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 114 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 62 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 52 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.214
Variant links:
Genes affected
P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 1-42757837-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42757837-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 379768.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr1-42757837-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.214 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0511 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
P3H1NM_022356.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1026C>T p.Ala342= synonymous_variant 5/15 ENST00000296388.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
P3H1ENST00000296388.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1026C>T p.Ala342= synonymous_variant 5/151 NM_022356.4 P1Q32P28-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0146
AC:
2224
AN:
152186
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0505
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00648
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00815
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00396
AC:
995
AN:
251492
Hom.:
25
AF XY:
0.00304
AC XY:
413
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00154
AC:
2257
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
52
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00131
AC XY:
956
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0531
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00349
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000854
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00346
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0146
AC:
2227
AN:
152304
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0144
AC XY:
1074
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0504
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00640
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00806
Alfa
AF:
0.00629
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.0166
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 10, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenSep 13, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.20
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.20
Position offset: -11

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61100157; hg19: chr1-43223508; API