rs612969
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the p.Arg317Gly variant in the TECTA gene is 67.5% (16434/24006) of African chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BA1). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA136018/MONDO:0019497/005
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005422.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECTA | NM_005422.4 | c.1111A>G | p.Arg371Gly | missense_variant | 7/24 | ENST00000392793.6 | NP_005413.2 | |
TBCEL-TECTA | NM_001378761.1 | c.2068A>G | p.Arg690Gly | missense_variant | 13/30 | NP_001365690.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECTA | ENST00000392793.6 | c.1111A>G | p.Arg371Gly | missense_variant | 7/24 | 5 | NM_005422.4 | ENSP00000376543 | P4 | |
TECTA | ENST00000264037.2 | c.1111A>G | p.Arg371Gly | missense_variant | 6/23 | 1 | ENSP00000264037 | P4 | ||
TECTA | ENST00000642222.1 | c.1111A>G | p.Arg371Gly | missense_variant | 7/24 | ENSP00000493855 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.475 AC: 72144AN: 151848Hom.: 18595 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.398 AC: 99962AN: 251444Hom.: 21085 AF XY: 0.391 AC XY: 53154AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.418 AC: 610985AN: 1461832Hom.: 130676 Cov.: 63 AF XY: 0.413 AC XY: 300683AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.475 AC: 72204AN: 151966Hom.: 18608 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.468 AC XY: 34752AN XY: 74258
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Arg371Gly in Exon 06 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 41.0% (2877/7020) of European Americ an chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ht tp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs612969). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 10, 2021 | - - |
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Hearing Loss Variant Curation Expert Panel | Sep 28, 2018 | The filtering allele frequency of the p.Arg317Gly variant in the TECTA gene is 67.5% (16434/24006) of African chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel for autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive hearing loss variants (BA1). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at