rs616522
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000371447.4(PDE6C):c.1270-7A>G variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.748 in 1,605,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 450,883 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000371447.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDE6C | NM_006204.4 | c.1270-7A>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000371447.4 | NP_006195.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDE6C | ENST00000371447.4 | c.1270-7A>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_006204.4 | ENSP00000360502 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.734 AC: 111462AN: 151890Hom.: 40982 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.733 AC: 184050AN: 251112Hom.: 68016 AF XY: 0.741 AC XY: 100634AN XY: 135752
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.750 AC: 1089779AN: 1453926Hom.: 409863 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.752 AC XY: 544550AN XY: 723928
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.734 AC: 111558AN: 152008Hom.: 41020 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.735 AC XY: 54635AN XY: 74290
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cone dystrophy 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Achromatopsia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at