Menu
GeneBe

rs61729797

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):c.4680G>A(p.Ala1560=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00631 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 596 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 315 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 281 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.89
Variant links:
Genes affected
DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 14-95096240-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95096240-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261925.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-95096240-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.89 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.114 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DICER1NM_177438.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4680G>A p.Ala1560= synonymous_variant 23/27 ENST00000343455.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DICER1ENST00000343455.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4680G>A p.Ala1560= synonymous_variant 23/271 NM_177438.3 P1Q9UPY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0334
AC:
5079
AN:
152156
Hom.:
314
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.117
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00893
AC:
2244
AN:
251412
Hom.:
125
AF XY:
0.00640
AC XY:
869
AN XY:
135866
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00546
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00472
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00349
AC:
5095
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
281
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00294
AC XY:
2141
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00615
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000371
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00815
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0334
AC:
5091
AN:
152274
Hom.:
315
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0323
AC XY:
2406
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.117
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000221
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0175
Alfa
AF:
0.0161
Hom.:
72
Bravo
AF:
0.0382
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00895
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 04, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 13, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 16, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
DICER1-related tumor predisposition Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Pleuropulmonary blastoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 25, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
Cadd
Benign
1.3
Dann
Benign
0.52
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61729797; hg19: chr14-95562577; API