rs61731965

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000271.5(NPC1):c.966C>T(p.Ser322Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 1,614,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.011 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

NPC1
NM_000271.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.347

Variant links:

Genes affected

NPC1 (HGNC:7897): (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1) This gene encodes a large protein that resides in the limiting membrane of endosomes and lysosomes and mediates intracellular cholesterol trafficking via binding of cholesterol to its N-terminal domain. It is predicted to have a cytoplasmic C-terminus, 13 transmembrane domains, and 3 large loops in the lumen of the endosome - the last loop being at the N-terminus. This protein transports low-density lipoproteins to late endosomal/lysosomal compartments where they are hydrolized and released as free cholesterol. Defects in this gene cause Niemann-Pick type C disease, a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by over accumulation of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

NPC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).

BP6

Variant 18-23556603-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-23556603-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 326274.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr18-23556603-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr18-23556603-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.347 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0114 (1732/152290) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0387 (1606/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0371. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 815 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NPC1	NM_000271.5 link	c.966C>T	p.Ser322Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 25	ENST00000269228.10	NP_000262.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NPC1	ENST00000269228.10 link	c.966C>T	p.Ser322Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 25	1	NM_000271.5	ENSP00000269228.4	O15118-1
NPC1	ENST00000591051.1 link	c.246C>T	p.Ser82Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 18	2		ENSP00000467636.1	K7EQ23
NPC1	ENST00000540608.5 link	n.880C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 16	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0113

AC:

1723

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0386

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00360

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00912

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00860

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00376

AC:

939

AN:

249884

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00326

AC XY:

441

AN XY:

135282

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0394

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00745

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000444

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00181

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00156

AC:

2282

AN:

1461778

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00163

AC XY:

1188

AN XY:

727190

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0401

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00213

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00747

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00270

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0114

AC:

1732

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0109

AC XY:

815

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0387

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00359

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00872

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0109

Alfa

AF:

0.000781

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0130

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00462

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Niemann-Pick disease, type C1

Benign:3

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

6.3

DANN

Benign

0.74

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over