rs61732664

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004999.4(MYO6):​c.1120T>C​(p.Tyr374His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00413 in 1,612,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 363 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 42 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 321 hom. )

Consequence

MYO6
NM_004999.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.50

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
MYO6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • progressive sensorineural hearing loss-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0020512044).
BP6
Variant 6-75855180-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-75855180-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45133.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0593 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO6NM_004999.4 linkc.1120T>C p.Tyr374His missense_variant Exon 12 of 35 ENST00000369977.8 NP_004990.3 Q9UM54-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO6ENST00000369977.8 linkc.1120T>C p.Tyr374His missense_variant Exon 12 of 35 1 NM_004999.4 ENSP00000358994.3 Q9UM54-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00754
AC:
1148
AN:
152190
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0621
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00908
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0172
AC:
4306
AN:
250720
AF XY:
0.0130
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00567
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0123
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00377
AC:
5502
AN:
1460370
Hom.:
321
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00320
AC XY:
2327
AN XY:
726536
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00168
AC:
56
AN:
33424
American (AMR)
AF:
0.111
AC:
4933
AN:
44616
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00527
AC:
209
AN:
39634
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
14
AN:
86200
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000693
AC:
77
AN:
1110914
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00353
AC:
213
AN:
60326
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
324
649
973
1298
1622
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
80
160
240
320
400
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00760
AC:
1157
AN:
152308
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00827
AC XY:
616
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
138
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0626
AC:
957
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00539
AC:
28
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000191
AC:
13
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00899
AC:
19
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
57
113
170
226
283
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00216
Hom.:
20
Bravo
AF:
0.0130
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00431
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000698
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.0128
AC:
1557
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Sep 20, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 10, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tyr374His in exon 12 of MYO6: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because this residue is not highly conserved across species. In additio n, this variant has now been identified in 5/29 (17%) Hispanic probands tested b y our laboratory and is listed in dbSNP with a frequency of 0.2% (12/5596) in co ntrol chromosomes (rs61732664). -

not provided Benign:3
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37;C2931767:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Jul 28, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.085
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.42
T;.;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.40
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.60
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;.;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0021
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.045
.;N;N;N;.;.
PhyloP100
1.5
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.28
Sift
Benign
0.53
T;T;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.54
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020, 0.0
.;B;B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.034
MPC
0.34
ClinPred
0.0075
T
GERP RS
4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
gMVP
0.37
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61732664; hg19: chr6-76564897; API