rs61733577

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):ā€‹c.880A>Gā€‹(p.Arg294Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000624 in 1,611,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC39
NM_181426.2 missense

Scores

3
8
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
CCDC39 (HGNC:25244): (coiled-coil domain 39 molecular ruler complex subunit) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the motility of cilia and flagella. The encoded protein is essential for the assembly of dynein regulatory and inner dynein arm complexes, which regulate ciliary beat. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 14 (CILD14). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.033319354).
BP6
Variant 3-180654812-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-180654812-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 344274.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00142 (216/152212) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00419 (174/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00368. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 88 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CCDC39NM_181426.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.880A>G p.Arg294Gly missense_variant 7/20 ENST00000476379.6 NP_852091.1 Q9UFE4-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CCDC39ENST00000476379.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.880A>G p.Arg294Gly missense_variant 7/202 NM_181426.2 ENSP00000417960.2 Q9UFE4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00142
AC:
216
AN:
152094
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00420
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000584
AC:
144
AN:
246684
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000515
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
133934
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00411
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000236
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000643
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000541
AC:
789
AN:
1459080
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000544
AC XY:
395
AN XY:
725760
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00429
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000117
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000556
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000282
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00142
AC:
216
AN:
152212
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00118
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000669
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00144
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00440
AC:
16
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000733
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000786
AC:
95
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000867
AC:
4
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.000439
EpiControl
AF:
0.000658

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 17, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 30, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 23, 2022In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
CCDC39-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 10, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.36
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.012
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.24
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.034
T
Eigen
Benign
0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.093
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.59
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.095
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.033
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.20
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.5
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.43
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.74
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
1.4
Varity_R
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.13
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61733577; hg19: chr3-180372600; API