rs61734424

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):​c.1149T>C​(p.Phe383Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.043 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,561 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.060 ( 415 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.041 ( 2146 hom. )

Consequence

MYH14
NM_001145809.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.57

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 19-50244276-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50244276-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44046.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.57 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH14NM_001145809.2 linkc.1149T>C p.Phe383Phe synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 43 ENST00000642316.2 NP_001139281.1
MYH14NM_001077186.2 linkc.1149T>C p.Phe383Phe synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 42 NP_001070654.1
MYH14NM_024729.4 linkc.1125T>C p.Phe375Phe synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 41 NP_079005.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH14ENST00000642316.2 linkc.1149T>C p.Phe383Phe synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 43 NM_001145809.2 ENSP00000493594.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0600
AC:
9124
AN:
152062
Hom.:
409
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0871
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.112
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0455
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0443
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0328
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0653
AC:
16232
AN:
248718
AF XY:
0.0581
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0873
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0515
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.107
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0333
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0572
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0412
AC:
60244
AN:
1461596
Hom.:
2146
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0402
AC XY:
29256
AN XY:
727096
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0833
AC:
2788
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.191
AC:
8529
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0520
AC:
1358
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
82
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0362
AC:
3126
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.106
AC:
5672
AN:
53358
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0307
AC:
177
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0322
AC:
35795
AN:
1111820
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0450
AC:
2717
AN:
60368
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3147
6294
9441
12588
15735
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1490
2980
4470
5960
7450
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0602
AC:
9154
AN:
152180
Hom.:
415
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0629
AC XY:
4676
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0873
AC:
3625
AN:
41528
American (AMR)
AF:
0.113
AC:
1723
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0455
AC:
158
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00193
AC:
10
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
152
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.104
AC:
1106
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
12
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0328
AC:
2232
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0615
AC:
130
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
428
856
1284
1712
2140
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
100
200
300
400
500
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0436
Hom.:
148
Bravo
AF:
0.0655
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0330
AC:
113
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0338
EpiControl
AF:
0.0307

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Phe383Phe in Exon 11 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 8.1% (292/3598) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs61734424). -

Aug 31, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
0.70
DANN
Benign
0.41
PhyloP100
-1.6
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61734424; hg19: chr19-50747533; COSMIC: COSV51835389; API