rs61735045

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):​c.1588G>A​(p.Gly530Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0408 in 1,613,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,546 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G530G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 111 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.042 ( 1435 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A1
NM_000093.5 missense

Scores

5
12

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.24

Publications

30 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL5A1 (HGNC:2209): (collagen type V alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. The encoded procollagen protein occurs commonly as the heterotrimer pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha2(V). Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
COL5A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • arterial disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0056170523).
BP6
Variant 9-134750808-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-134750808-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 38863.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0317 (4824/152296) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0477 (3242/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0463. There are 111 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2243 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 4824 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000093.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL5A1
NM_000093.5
MANE Select
c.1588G>Ap.Gly530Ser
missense
Exon 13 of 66NP_000084.3
COL5A1
NM_001278074.1
c.1588G>Ap.Gly530Ser
missense
Exon 13 of 66NP_001265003.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL5A1
ENST00000371817.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1588G>Ap.Gly530Ser
missense
Exon 13 of 66ENSP00000360882.3
COL5A1
ENST00000371820.4
TSL:2
c.1588G>Ap.Gly530Ser
missense
Exon 13 of 66ENSP00000360885.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0317
AC:
4827
AN:
152178
Hom.:
111
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00770
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0395
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0313
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0314
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0476
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0411
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0347
AC:
8689
AN:
250360
AF XY:
0.0365
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00744
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0282
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000762
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0469
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0357
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0418
AC:
61014
AN:
1460838
Hom.:
1435
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0419
AC XY:
30477
AN XY:
726732
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00636
AC:
213
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0248
AC:
1107
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0293
AC:
765
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000680
AC:
27
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0378
AC:
3262
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0331
AC:
1741
AN:
52544
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0394
AC:
227
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0461
AC:
51291
AN:
1111856
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0394
AC:
2381
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3372
6744
10115
13487
16859
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1852
3704
5556
7408
9260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0317
AC:
4824
AN:
152296
Hom.:
111
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0301
AC XY:
2243
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00767
AC:
319
AN:
41576
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0312
AC:
478
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0314
AC:
109
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00155
AC:
8
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0387
AC:
187
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0325
AC:
345
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0476
AC:
14
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0477
AC:
3242
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0407
AC:
86
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
237
474
711
948
1185
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0402
Hom.:
253
Bravo
AF:
0.0301
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0526
AC:
195
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0444
AC:
171
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00885
AC:
39
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0433
AC:
372
ExAC
AF:
0.0353
AC:
4291
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0230
AC:
81
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0492
EpiControl
AF:
0.0515

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Sep 07, 2017
Institute for Genomic Medicine (IGM) Clinical Laboratory, Nationwide Children's Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1, BS2, BP6; This alteration has an allele frequency that is greater than expected for the associated disease, was seen in a healthy adult where full penetrance of the disorder is expected at an early age, and was reported as a benign/likely benign alteration by a reputable source (ClinVar or other correspondence from a clinical testing laboratory).

Dec 01, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 25, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency

not provided Benign:5
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 10, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The COL5A1 c.1588G>A (p.Gly530Ser) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 2/3 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 4263/119292 control chromosomes (103 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0357358, which is approximately 28589 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic COL5A1 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign In the past, this variant was considered disease-modifying in heterozygotes and disease-causing in homozygotes, but new data from ExAC is supporting the fact that it is a benign variant. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:3
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 02, 2020
Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type Benign:1Other:1
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

GeneReviews
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

Fibromuscular dysplasia, multifocal Benign:1
Mar 15, 2022
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
May 21, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jun 17, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1;C5543412:Fibromuscular dysplasia, multifocal Benign:1
Oct 01, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.094
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.21
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0056
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.13
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.88
L
PhyloP100
7.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Benign
0.28
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.23
MPC
1.5
ClinPred
0.031
T
GERP RS
4.5
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.90
Mutation Taster
=75/25
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61735045; hg19: chr9-137642654; COSMIC: COSV65667766; API