rs61735272

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):​c.1286T>C​(p.Leu429Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00199 in 1,551,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense

Scores

1
5
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.99

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
RBM20 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04264185).
BP6
Variant 10-110783376-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110783376-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 43969.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (186/152362) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0021 (143/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00182. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 80 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 186 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001134363.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RBM20
NM_001134363.3
MANE Select
c.1286T>Cp.Leu429Pro
missense
Exon 3 of 14NP_001127835.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
RBM20
ENST00000369519.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1286T>Cp.Leu429Pro
missense
Exon 3 of 14ENSP00000358532.3
RBM20
ENST00000718239.1
c.1286T>Cp.Leu429Pro
missense
Exon 3 of 14ENSP00000520684.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00122
AC:
186
AN:
152244
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000847
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000955
AC:
151
AN:
158180
AF XY:
0.000899
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000809
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000234
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000884
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000667
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00207
AC:
2901
AN:
1398938
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00203
AC XY:
1398
AN XY:
689984
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000317
AC:
10
AN:
31558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000616
AC:
22
AN:
35694
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000199
AC:
5
AN:
25166
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35728
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000253
AC:
2
AN:
79194
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000851
AC:
42
AN:
49376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000180
AC:
1
AN:
5546
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00250
AC:
2694
AN:
1078620
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
125
AN:
58056
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.458
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
131
262
394
525
656
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
102
204
306
408
510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
186
AN:
152362
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000553
AC:
23
AN:
41584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000588
AC:
9
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000847
AC:
9
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00210
AC:
143
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11
23
34
46
57
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00175
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00130
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00324
AC:
12
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00409
AC:
13
ExAC
AF:
0.000902
AC:
24

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
Feb 11, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria.

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 14, 2016
Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:provider interpretation

Jul 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RBM20: BS1

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:3Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 12, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Leu429Pro variant (rs61735272) has not been reported in the medical literature. The p.Leu429Pro variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) browser with an allele frequency of 0.17% in the non-Finnish European population (identified in 122 out of 73,780 chromosomes), and is classified as likely benign by multiple labs in ClinVar (Variant ID: 43969). The leucine at codon 429 is weakly conserved considering 11 species (Alamut software v2.10.0), but computational analyses predict conflicting effects of this variant on protein structure/function (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen2: benign, MutationTaster: disease causing). Based on the available information, the clinical significance of the p.Leu429Pro variant cannot be determined with certainty.

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 20, 2015
Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

not specified Benign:5
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 30, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu429Pro in exon 3 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 0.4% (13/3182) of European American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/rs61735272). Leu429Pro in exon 3 of RBM20 (rs617352 72; allele frequency = 0.4%, 13/3182) **

Dec 21, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: RBM20 c.1286T>C (p.Leu429Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Matrin/U1-C-like C2H2-type zinc finger domain (IPR003604) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 151016 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0021 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v3.1), including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 45-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (4.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1286T>C in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (i.e. 5 calling it likely benign and 5 classifying it as VUS). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

May 23, 2017
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 10, 2019
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 12, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 31, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.80
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.28
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.37
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.018
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.043
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
PhyloP100
5.0
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.59
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.74
N
REVEL
Benign
0.086
Sift
Benign
0.036
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.068
T
Vest4
0.68
MVP
0.52
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
4.4
gMVP
0.85
Mutation Taster
=59/41
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61735272; hg19: chr10-112543134; API