rs61737106
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_003680.4(YARS1):c.1082A>T(p.Glu361Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00054 in 1,614,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003680.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YARS1 | NM_003680.4 | c.1082A>T | p.Glu361Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 13 | ENST00000373477.9 | NP_003671.1 | |
YARS1 | XM_011542347.3 | c.452A>T | p.Glu151Val | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 11 | XP_011540649.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00305 AC: 465AN: 152228Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000712 AC: 179AN: 251354Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000442 AC XY: 60AN XY: 135858
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000270 AC: 394AN: 1461872Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000226 AC XY: 164AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00314 AC: 478AN: 152346Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00302 AC XY: 225AN XY: 74496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate C Benign:1
- -
YARS1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at