rs61739261
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001127198.5(TMC6):c.1482C>T(p.Ala494Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00381 in 1,613,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127198.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- epidermodysplasia verruciformis, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- epidermodysplasia verruciformisInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMC6 | NM_001127198.5 | c.1482C>T | p.Ala494Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 12 of 20 | ENST00000590602.6 | NP_001120670.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0133 AC: 2027AN: 152152Hom.: 45 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00528 AC: 1320AN: 249976 AF XY: 0.00484 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00281 AC: 4112AN: 1460924Hom.: 49 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00280 AC XY: 2033AN XY: 726776 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0133 AC: 2030AN: 152270Hom.: 45 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0129 AC XY: 958AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
- -
Epidermodysplasia verruciformis Benign:1
- -
TMC6-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at