rs61742891

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_003611.3(OFD1):c.2052C>G(p.Ser684Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000942 in 1,167,496 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. There are 298 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0051 ( 5 hom., 145 hem., cov: 23)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 2 hom. 153 hem. )

Consequence

OFD1
NM_003611.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.50

Variant links:

Genes affected

OFD1 (HGNC:2567): (OFD1 centriole and centriolar satellite protein) This gene is located on the X chromosome and encodes a centrosomal protein. A knockout mouse model has been used to study the effect of mutations in this gene. The mouse gene is also located on the X chromosome, however, unlike the human gene it is not subject to X inactivation. Mutations in this gene are associated with oral-facial-digital syndrome type I and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2. Many pseudogenes have been identified; a single pseudogene is found on chromosome 5 while as many as fifteen have been found on the Y chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

OFD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).

BP6

Variant X-13760512-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-13760512-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 194631.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.5 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00511 (572/111887) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0174 (534/30731). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0162. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 145 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OFD1	NM_003611.3 link	c.2052C>G	p.Ser684Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 23	ENST00000340096.11	NP_003602.1	O75665-1E9KL37

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OFD1	ENST00000340096.11 link	c.2052C>G	p.Ser684Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 23	1	NM_003611.3	ENSP00000344314.6		O75665-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00511

AC:

572

AN:

111833

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00427

AC XY:

145

AN XY:

33991

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0174

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00263

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000376

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00539

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00170

AC:

248

AN:

146019

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00116

AC XY:

AN XY:

48201

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0188

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000584

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000146

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000874

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000500

AC:

528

AN:

1055609

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000448

AC XY:

153

AN XY:

341475

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0180

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000607

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00111

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00511

AC:

572

AN:

111887

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00426

AC XY:

145

AN XY:

34055

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0174

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00263

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000376

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00533

Alfa

AF:

0.000219

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00648

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 17, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:1

Jul 12, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial aplasia of the vermis;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.91

CADD

Benign

0.047

DANN

Benign

0.30

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over