rs61743849
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_017780.4(CHD7):āc.6822T>Cā(p.Ala2274=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000229 in 1,613,718 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous
NM_017780.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.342
Genes affected
CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 8-60854409-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60854409-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 196789.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr8-60854409-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.342 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 33 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | NM_017780.4 | c.6822T>C | p.Ala2274= | synonymous_variant | 32/38 | ENST00000423902.7 | NP_060250.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHD7 | ENST00000423902.7 | c.6822T>C | p.Ala2274= | synonymous_variant | 32/38 | 5 | NM_017780.4 | ENSP00000392028 | P1 | |
CHD7 | ENST00000524602.5 | c.1717-7820T>C | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000437061 | |||||
CHD7 | ENST00000695853.1 | c.6775+909T>C | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | ENSP00000512218 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152198
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000506 AC: 126AN: 249088Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000548 AC XY: 74AN XY: 135138
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
126
AN:
249088
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
135138
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000230 AC: 336AN: 1461402Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000243 AC XY: 177AN XY: 726978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
336
AN:
1461402
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
177
AN XY:
726978
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152316
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 30, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2023 | CHD7: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 23, 2017 | p.Ala2274Ala in exon 32 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.10% (12/11440) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs61743849). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 25, 2017 | Variant summary: The CHD7 c.6822T>C (p.Ala2274Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SC35. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 42/119700 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003509, which is approximately 281 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CHD7 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Although multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance, this variant is classified as benign based on its frequency in controls. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 22, 2016 | - - |
CHARGE syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 29, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at