rs61743849

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_017780.4(CHD7):c.6822T>C(p.Ala2274Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000229 in 1,613,718 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CHD7
NM_017780.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.342

Variant links:

Genes affected

CHD7 (HGNC:20626): (chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7) This gene encodes a protein that contains several helicase family domains. Mutations in this gene have been found in some patients with the CHARGE syndrome. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

CHD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 8-60854409-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-60854409-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 196789.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr8-60854409-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.342 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000217 (33/152316) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000588 (9/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000306. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 33 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	NM_017780.4 link	c.6822T>C	p.Ala2274Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 32 of 38	ENST00000423902.7	NP_060250.2	Q9P2D1-1Q6ZWF9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHD7	ENST00000423902.7 link	c.6822T>C	p.Ala2274Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 32 of 38	5	NM_017780.4	ENSP00000392028.1	Q9P2D1-1
CHD7	ENST00000524602.5 link	c.1717-7820T>C		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 4	1		ENSP00000437061.1	Q9P2D1-4
CHD7	ENST00000695853.1 link	n.6775+909T>C		intron_variant	Intron 31 of 36			ENSP00000512218.1	A0A8Q3WKT9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000223

AC:

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000506

AC:

126

AN:

249088

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000548

AC XY:

AN XY:

135138

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00125

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00537

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00116

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000230

AC:

336

AN:

1461402

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000243

AC XY:

177

AN XY:

726978

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00547

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000810

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000696

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000588

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000720

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000385

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000601

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 30, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CHD7: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Aug 23, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ala2274Ala in exon 32 of CHD7: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.10% (12/11440) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs61743849). -

Sep 25, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The CHD7 c.6822T>C (p.Ala2274Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SC35. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 42/119700 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003509, which is approximately 281 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CHD7 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. Although multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance, this variant is classified as benign based on its frequency in controls. -

Jul 22, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CHARGE syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Dec 29, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

8.4

DANN

Benign

0.72

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over